Doctrine of Pleasure and Tenure of Public Servants (Article 310)
Article 310 embodies the doctrine of pleasure: civil servants and defence personnel hold office at the President's or Governor's pleasure, not a fixed term.
At a glance
Article 310 provides that most civil servants and defence personnel hold office "during the pleasure" of the President (Union) or Governor (State), rather than for a fixed term.
Clause (1) covers defence, all-India, and Union civil service members plus civil posts under the Union (President's pleasure) and State civil servants/posts (Governor's pleasure); Clause (2) permits limited contractual exceptions.
It is the constitutional default for civil service tenure, qualified by "except as expressly provided" exceptions such as the fixed tenure given to UPSC members.
Doctrine of pleasure is the constitutional principle, set out in Article 310, under which most persons serving the Union or a State — civil servants, defence personnel, and holders of most government posts — do not hold a fixed term of office but instead continue "during the pleasure" of the President or the Governor concerned. It settles a basic structural question about who ultimately controls the continuation in service of the officials who staff the government machinery, and on what terms that continuation can be ended.
What Article 310 Provides
Article 310(1) states that every person who is a member of a defence service, or of a civil service of the Union, or of an all-India service, or who holds any civil post connected with defence, or any other civil post under the Union, holds office "during the pleasure of the President." A parallel rule applies at the State level: every person who is a member of a civil service of a State, or who holds a civil post under a State, holds office "during the pleasure of the Governor" of that State.
The clause opens with an important qualifier — "Except as expressly provided by this Constitution." This signals that the pleasure rule is a general default, not an absolute command that overrides every other part of the Constitution. Where the Constitution itself creates a different arrangement for a particular office, that arrangement prevails over the blanket pleasure doctrine.
Clause (2) adds a further refinement. It permits contractual arrangements for certain appointees — persons who are not members of a defence service, an all-India service, or a civil service of the Union or a State — who are appointed under the Constitution. This recognises that government service is not staffed solely through the standard civil-service route, and that some appointments can carry specifically defined contractual terms rather than a bare at-pleasure tenure.
Who Is Covered, and Whose Pleasure Applies
The rule under Article 310 splits along Union–State lines, with the President and the Governor each holding the "pleasure" over a distinct set of appointees:
| Category of appointee | Tenure held at the pleasure of |
|---|---|
| Member of a defence service | President |
| Member of a civil service of the Union | President |
| Member of an all-India service | President |
| Holder of a civil post connected with defence, or any other civil post under the Union | President |
| Member of a civil service of a State | Governor of that State |
| Holder of a civil post under a State | Governor of that State |
Not an Absolute Rule
Although Article 310 reads broadly, the Constitution builds exceptions into the wider scheme, and two comparisons drawn from elsewhere in the Constitution show this clearly.
First, the Governor of a State — whose own pleasure governs the tenure of state civil servants — does not enjoy secure tenure either. Under Article 156, a Governor holds office for a term of five years, but this term is itself subject to the pleasure of the President. A Governor has no guaranteed security of tenure, can be removed at any time without any grounds being specified, and may also resign by addressing a letter to the President. In other words, the very authority who exercises "pleasure" over state civil servants is, in turn, subject to the pleasure of the President.
Second, the Chairman and Members of the Union Public Service Commission stand in sharp contrast. They are appointed by the President, but once appointed they are given a fixed tenure and cannot be removed except through a specified process — not at the President's unrestricted pleasure. This departure from the ordinary Article 310 position is deliberate: it is meant to protect the independence of a constitutional body that conducts examinations and recruitment for the civil and defence services and is expected to function without day-to-day interference from the government of the day.
These two contrasts show the shape of the doctrine: Article 310 supplies the general rule for the ordinary civil and defence services, while the Constitution elsewhere carves out pockets of secured tenure precisely where independence from the executive is considered essential to the office.
Why the Doctrine Is Structured This Way
By tying the tenure of most civil servants and defence personnel to the pleasure of the President or Governor, rather than fixing a set term of years, Article 310 keeps the ordinary services structurally answerable to the political executive at the Union or State level. This is distinct from bodies such as the Public Service Commissions, whose members the Constitution deliberately insulates through fixed and secure tenure so that recruitment to public services is not left exposed to the same at-pleasure arrangement that governs the services themselves.
UPSC Relevance
Prelims
- Article 310 lays down the doctrine of pleasure; the President's pleasure covers defence services, civil services of the Union, all-India services, and civil posts under the Union, while the Governor's pleasure covers civil services of, and civil posts under, a State.
- The opening words "Except as expressly provided by this Constitution" mean the doctrine is a default rule subject to other express constitutional provisions.
- Under Article 156, the Governor's five-year term is itself subject to the President's pleasure.
- Members of the Union Public Service Commission have a fixed tenure and are not removable at the President's unrestricted pleasure — a notable exception to the Article 310 scheme.
Mains
- Explain the doctrine of pleasure under Article 310 and discuss how the Constitution qualifies it for specific offices to protect institutional independence.
- Compare the tenure security enjoyed by an ordinary civil servant, a Governor, and a member of a Public Service Commission, and examine what this reveals about the constitutional design of accountability versus independence in public offices.
FAQ
Q1. What is the doctrine of pleasure under Article 310? It is the rule that most persons serving the Union — members of defence services, civil services, all-India services, and holders of most civil posts — hold office during the pleasure of the President, while persons serving a State in a similar capacity hold office during the pleasure of the Governor.
Q2. Does the doctrine of pleasure apply to everyone in government service? No. Article 310 itself opens with "Except as expressly provided by this Constitution," and Clause (2) permits contractual arrangements for certain non-service appointees. Elsewhere, the Constitution secures fixed tenure for specific offices, such as members of the Public Service Commissions.
Q3. Is the Governor's own tenure protected from removal? No. Under Article 156, although a Governor's term is five years, it is itself held during the pleasure of the President, so a Governor can be removed at any time without specified grounds.
Q4. Why are Union Public Service Commission members given fixed tenure instead of at-pleasure tenure? Because the Commission conducts examinations and recruitment for the civil and defence services and is expected to function independently of the government of the day; fixed, secure tenure protects that independence from the ordinary Article 310 pleasure doctrine.
Q5. Does Article 310 mean civil servants can be dismissed without any process? Article 310 itself only establishes who holds the pleasure over an appointee's tenure; it does not by itself describe any dismissal procedure, and its opening qualifier makes clear that other express constitutional provisions can condition how that pleasure is exercised.
Quick Revision
- Article 310(1): Union services/posts → President's pleasure; State services/posts → Governor's pleasure.
- "Except as expressly provided by this Constitution" — the doctrine is a default, not absolute.
- Article 310(2): allows contractual terms for certain non-service appointees.
- Article 156: Governor's 5-year term is itself subject to the President's pleasure.
- UPSC Chairman/Members: fixed tenure, not removable at unrestricted pleasure — a built-in exception.
Sources
- The Constitution of India — Ministry of Law and Justice, Government of India (legislative.gov.in)
- India Code — Constitution of India, full text
Further Reference
For deeper reading on this topic and the wider polity syllabus, these standard works are recommended:
- M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (McGraw Hill) — the standard UPSC handbook.
- D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India (LexisNexis) — authoritative constitutional-law treatment.
- The Constitution of India — Bare Act — the official text.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, UPSC.wiki earns from qualifying purchases — at no extra cost to you.
Constitutional provisions
Tenure of office of persons serving the Union or a State — lays down the doctrine of pleasure.
Governor holds office for five years, but this term is itself subject to the pleasure of the President.
