Kinds of Majority in Parliament

Kinds of majority required in Parliament vary depending on the constitutional provision under which a particular question is decided, ranging from a simple majority of members present and voting to more demanding special-majority formulas that combine a threshold of total membership with a threshold of members present and voting. The Constitution does not use a single uniform voting rule for all business — it prescribes different majority requirements for different kinds of decisions.

Simple Majority

A simple majority is a majority of the members actually present and voting, without regard to the total strength of the House or the number of absentees. The Constitution's provisions on the formation of new states and the alteration of the areas, boundaries, or names of existing states — under Articles 3 and 4 — are decided by a simple majority in Parliament. Under this power, Parliament may separate territory from a state, unite two or more states, increase or diminish the area of a state, or alter its boundaries or name, on the President's recommendation. An affected State Legislature may express its views, but the final decision rests with Parliament acting by simple majority, and the state cannot resist Parliament's will.

Special Majority for Constitutional Amendments: Article 368

Article 368 lays down the procedure for amending the Constitution. Most amendments require a Bill to be passed in each House by a majority of the total membership of that House, and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting. Where an amendment seeks to affect certain federal provisions, it must additionally be ratified by the Legislatures of not less than one-half of the states before it is presented to the President for assent. This dual formula — total-membership majority plus a two-thirds majority of those present and voting — is considerably more demanding than a simple majority, since it requires support beyond just those who turn up to vote.

Special Majority for Legislative Councils: Article 169

A similarly structured special majority appears in Article 169, which allows Parliament to abolish an existing Legislative Council in a state, or create one where none exists, if the state's Legislative Assembly passes a resolution to that effect. That resolution itself must be passed by a majority of the total membership of the Assembly and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members present and voting — the same combined formula used for constitutional amendments under Article 368, even though the subject matter here is a state's own institutional structure rather than the Constitution itself.

A Different Special-Majority Formula: Article 61 (Impeachment)

Article 61, governing the impeachment of the President for violation of the Constitution, uses a somewhat different formula. The charge must first be preferred in a House through a resolution moved after at least fourteen days' written notice, signed by not less than one-fourth of the total membership of that House. The resolution itself must then be passed by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the total membership of the House — a threshold measured purely against total membership, without the additional "present and voting" qualifier used in Articles 368 and 169.

Special Majority for Removing Judges

A comparably demanding special majority governs the removal of a Judge of the Supreme Court or a High Court, who can be removed only on grounds of proved misbehaviour or incapacity, through a motion that must clear a special majority in both Houses of Parliament. This difficult threshold is one reason why, in India's constitutional history, formal removal proceedings against a sitting judge have rarely succeeded in reaching completion.

The Limit Even a Special Majority Cannot Cross

Even the special majority available under Article 368 is not unlimited. In Kesavananda Bharati (1973), the Supreme Court held that Parliament's power to amend the Constitution under Article 368, however wide, does not extend to altering the basic structure or essential features of the Constitution — a limitation that applies regardless of how large a majority backs the amendment.

Comparison Table

UPSC Relevance

Prelims: Distinguish the "total membership + two-thirds present and voting" formula (Articles 368, 169) from the "two-thirds of total membership alone" formula (Article 61 impeachment); note that simple majority governs Articles 3–4.

Mains: Useful for questions on constitutional amendment procedure, the rigidity/flexibility balance in the Indian Constitution, and how varying majority thresholds are used to calibrate the difficulty of different kinds of parliamentary decisions.

FAQ

What is a simple majority? A majority of the members present and voting in the House, without reference to the total strength of the House. It governs matters like state reorganisation under Articles 3 and 4.

What majority is needed to amend the Constitution? Under Article 368, most amendments need a majority of the total membership of each House and a two-thirds majority of members present and voting; amendments affecting certain federal provisions also need ratification by at least half the state legislatures.

Is the majority needed to impeach the President the same as for a constitutional amendment? No. Article 61 requires two-thirds of the total membership of the House, without the separate "present and voting" component used in Article 368.

Can Parliament use a special majority to change the basic structure of the Constitution? No. The Supreme Court held in Kesavananda Bharati (1973) that even a validly passed special-majority amendment under Article 368 cannot alter the Constitution's basic structure.

What majority is needed to create or abolish a State Legislative Council? The State Legislative Assembly's resolution under Article 169 needs a majority of its total membership and a two-thirds majority of members present and voting — the same combined formula as Article 368.

Quick Revision

• Simple majority — members present and voting; governs Articles 3–4 (state reorganisation).
• Article 368 — total membership majority + 2/3 present and voting (+ state ratification for federal provisions).
• Article 169 — same dual formula, for a State Assembly resolution on Legislative Councils.
• Article 61 — 2/3 of total membership alone, for presidential impeachment.
• Judge removal — special majority in both Houses; rarely completed.
• Kesavananda Bharati (1973) — basic structure cannot be altered even by special majority.

Sources

• Constitution of India, Articles 3, 4, 61, 169, 368 — legislative.gov.in
• Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) — Supreme Court of India

Further Reference

For deeper reading on this topic and the wider polity syllabus, these standard works are recommended:

• M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (McGraw Hill) — the standard UPSC handbook.
• D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India (LexisNexis) — authoritative constitutional-law treatment.
• The Constitution of India — Bare Act — the official text.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, UPSC.wiki earns from qualifying purchases — at no extra cost to you.