Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act 2013: Features and Criticisms
Lokpal Act 2013 created a central anti-corruption ombudsman and mandated state Lokayuktas — composition, CBI reforms, and key criticisms explained.
At a glance
A 2013 law creating Lokpal, a central anti-corruption ombudsman, and mandating state-level Lokayuktas.
Lokpal has superintendence over investigating agencies, including the CBI, for cases referred to it.
It gave India a statutory anti-corruption body with jurisdiction reaching the PM, Ministers, and MPs.
Timeline
Lokpal Act 2013 is the common short name for the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 — the law that created Lokpal as an anti-corruption ombudsman for the Union government and directed every state to legislate a corresponding Lokayukta. The Act gives Lokpal jurisdiction over the Prime Minister, Union Ministers, Members of Parliament, and all categories of public servants, and it hands Lokpal a supervisory role over investigating agencies, including the CBI, in cases referred to it.
Background: A Long Legislative History
A national anti-corruption ombudsman was debated in Parliament for decades before it became law. Multiple versions of a Lokpal Bill lapsed over the years — several with the dissolution of successive Lok Sabhas (including the 11th and 12th), one was withdrawn outright, and an eighth attempt introduced in 2001 lapsed with the dissolution of the 13th Lok Sabha in 2004. A ninth bill introduced in 2011 was also withdrawn. It was the tenth version — the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Bill, 2011, introduced by the UPA government under Prime Minister Manmohan Singh in December 2011 — that was finally enacted as the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013.
Composition and Jurisdiction of Lokpal
Lokpal is a multi-member body consisting of a Chairperson and a maximum of eight members, of whom at least half must be judicial members. Its jurisdiction extends to the Prime Minister (subject to specific safeguards), Union Ministers, Members of Parliament, and all tiers of central government employees.
Members of Lokpal, including the Chairperson, are chosen through a selection committee comprising the Prime Minister, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, the Chief Justice of India (or a judge nominated by the CJI), and an eminent jurist nominated by the President — a composition meant to keep selection broadly non-partisan by involving the executive, legislature, and judiciary together.
Superintendence Over the CBI
One of the Act's most consequential features is that Lokpal has powers of superintendence over investigating agencies, including the CBI, for matters referred to it. To operationalise this, the Act amended the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 — the law governing the CBI — with further changes via the Delhi Special Police Establishment (Amendment) Act, 2014. Together they altered how CBI leadership is appointed:
| Position | Appointing mechanism after the amendment |
|---|---|
| Director, CBI | A three-member committee: the Prime Minister (Chairperson), the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, and the Chief Justice of India (or a Supreme Court judge nominated by the CJI) |
| Director of Prosecution | Appointed by the Central Government on the recommendation of the Central Vigilance Commission; functions under the overall supervision of the CBI Director |
| Officers of the rank of Superintendent of Police and above | A committee consisting of the Central Vigilance Commissioner (Chairperson), the Vigilance Commissioners, the Home Secretary, and the Secretary, Department of Personnel |
The Act also requires the government to provide adequate funds to the CBI specifically for investigating cases that Lokpal refers to it, so that the agency is not resource-constrained when acting on Lokpal's directions.
Other Notable Provisions
- Foreign-funded entities: Organisations receiving foreign contributions exceeding ₹10 lakh a year, as regulated under the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, are brought within Lokpal's jurisdiction.
- Mandatory state Lokayuktas: States are required to enact a law establishing a Lokayukta within 365 days of the Act coming into force. Importantly, the Act leaves the exact structure and powers of the state Lokayukta to be decided by each state legislature, rather than prescribing a uniform model.
Lokayuktas: An Older, State-Level Institution
The idea of a state-level Lokayukta predates the 2013 Act by decades. Maharashtra was the first state to establish the institution, in 1971, though Odisha had passed enabling legislation even earlier, in 1970. Because states adopted the institution independently, no two Lokayukta systems are identical:
- The structural design of the Lokayukta — its composition, powers, and reporting lines — varies from state to state.
- Some states empower their Lokayukta to examine both "grievances" (maladministration) and "allegations" (corruption), while other states restrict the Lokayukta's mandate to allegations of corruption alone.
- Every Lokayukta submits an annual report on its work to the Governor, who places it before the state legislature along with an explanatory memorandum.
- Crucially, the recommendations made by a Lokayukta are advisory in nature and are not binding on the state government.
This lack of uniformity is precisely why the 2013 Act only mandates that a Lokayukta law be passed, without dictating its contents.
Conceptual Roots: The Ombudsman Idea and the ARC
The Lokpal-Lokayukta model belongs to a broader global family of grievance-redressal institutions, alongside devices such as the Ombudsman system, Administrative Courts, and the Procurator system used in different countries.
In India, the push for such an institution traces to the first Administrative Reforms Commission (headed by Morarji Desai), which submitted a special interim report on redressal of citizens' grievances in 1966. It recommended that Lokpal be appointed by the President after consulting the CJI, the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, and the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha, and that Lokpal and Lokayukta be demonstrably independent, conduct investigations privately and informally, have non-political appointments, and hold a status comparable to top judicial functionaries. Notably, the Commission recommended keeping the judiciary outside the purview of Lokpal and Lokayukta — unlike Sweden, where the judiciary falls within the Ombudsman's jurisdiction.
Criticisms and Drawbacks
Despite its scope, the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 has drawn several criticisms relating to how complaints are handled in practice:
| Criticism | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| No suo motu powers | Lokpal cannot initiate action against a public servant on its own; it must act on a complaint |
| Emphasis on form over substance | Procedural requirements for how a complaint is framed can matter more than the substance of the allegation |
| Deterrent penalties for false complaints | Heavy punishment prescribed for frivolous or false complaints may discourage genuine complainants from coming forward |
| No anonymous complaints | A complaint cannot simply be filed anonymously with supporting documents; the complainant must be identified |
| Legal aid to the accused official | The public servant against whom a complaint is filed is entitled to legal assistance, which critics say tilts the process |
| Seven-year limitation period | Complaints must be filed within seven years of the alleged offence, which can bar older but genuine grievances |
| Opaque process for complaints against the PM | The procedure for handling complaints against the Prime Minister is seen as insufficiently transparent |
UPSC Relevance
Prelims: Composition of Lokpal (Chairperson + max 8 members, 50% judicial); the Lokpal selection committee; Lokpal's jurisdiction over the PM, Ministers, and MPs; the FCRA threshold of ₹10 lakh bringing NGOs under Lokpal's ambit; the 365-day deadline for states to legislate a Lokayukta; Maharashtra's Lokayukta (1971).
Mains: Evaluate the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 as an anti-corruption mechanism (GS2 — governance, transparency, accountability); discuss the Delhi Special Police Establishment Act amendments and their impact on CBI's autonomy; assess why Lokayukta institutions across states lack uniformity.
FAQ
Q1. What is the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013? The central law that establishes Lokpal as an anti-corruption ombudsman for the Union government and requires every state to enact its own Lokayukta law within a set time frame.
Q2. Who can Lokpal investigate? The Prime Minister, Union Ministers, Members of Parliament, and all categories of central government employees, subject to the Act's specific procedures and safeguards.
Q3. How does Lokpal relate to the CBI? Lokpal has superintendence over the CBI for cases referred to it. The Act, and the 2014 DSPE amendment, also changed how the CBI Director and senior officers are appointed.
Q4. Is the Lokayukta the same in every state? No. Each state designs its own Lokayukta law, so composition and powers differ across states, and Lokayukta recommendations are advisory, not binding.
Q5. Can Lokpal act on its own without a complaint? No. Lokpal cannot proceed suo motu; it can only act upon a complaint filed with it — a frequently cited limitation of the Act.
Quick Revision
- Lokpal: Chairperson + up to 8 members; at least 50% must be judicial members.
- Selection committee: PM, Lok Sabha Speaker, Leader of Opposition (Lok Sabha), CJI, eminent jurist nominated by President.
- Lokpal jurisdiction: PM, Union Ministers, MPs, all central government employees.
- Lokpal has superintendence over the CBI for referred cases; DSPE Act amended in 2014 to change CBI leadership appointments.
- States must pass a Lokayukta law within 365 days; contours left to states.
- Maharashtra: first state to set up Lokayukta (1971); Odisha passed its Act in 1970.
- Lokayukta recommendations are advisory, not binding on state governments.
- Key criticisms: no suo motu power, no anonymous complaints, 7-year limitation period, opaque process for PM-related complaints.
Sources
- The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 (Act No. 1 of 2014) — Legislative Department, Government of India
- Delhi Special Police Establishment Act, 1946 — as amended by the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 and the DSPE (Amendment) Act, 2014
- Press Information Bureau — Government of India
Further Reference
For deeper reading on this topic and the wider polity syllabus, these standard works are recommended:
- M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (McGraw Hill) — the standard UPSC handbook.
- D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India (LexisNexis) — authoritative constitutional-law treatment.
- The Constitution of India — Bare Act — the official text.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, UPSC.wiki earns from qualifying purchases — at no extra cost to you.