PolityUPSC

Representation of Anglo-Indians in State Legislative Assemblies

By Abishek A 24 August 2026 Updated 8 September 2026 6 min read 4 views
Overview

Article 333 let Governors nominate one Anglo-Indian member to State Legislative Assemblies, until the 104th Amendment Act, 2019 ended the provision.

At a glance

What it is

Article 333 empowered a Governor to nominate one Anglo-Indian member to a State Legislative Assembly

Key provision

Operated "Notwithstanding anything in article 170" — an exception to direct election

Why it matters

Discontinued by the Constitution (104th Amendment) Act, 2019, effective 25 January 2020

Timeline

1950
Article 333 comes into force
Governor empowered to nominate one Anglo-Indian member to a State Legislative Assembly
2019
Constitution (104th Amendment) Act, 2019 enacted
Does not extend Anglo-Indian nomination to Lok Sabha or State Assemblies any further
2020
Provision ceases to have effect
From 25 January 2020, Anglo-Indian nomination under Articles 331 and 333 discontinued

Anglo-Indian state assembly representation was the constitutional arrangement, under Article 333, that allowed a state Governor to nominate one member of the Anglo-Indian community to that State's Legislative Assembly whenever the Governor formed the opinion that the community needed representation and was not already adequately represented among the elected members. It operated as a narrow, discretionary exception to the ordinary rule that Assemblies are composed of directly elected members, and it no longer has effect today.

What Article 333 Provided

Article 333 stated that the Governor "may, if he is of opinion that the Anglo-Indian community needs representation in the Legislative Assembly of the State and is not adequately represented therein, nominate one member of that community to the Assembly." The word "may" made the step discretionary rather than compulsory: a Governor was not obliged to nominate anyone, and the ceiling was fixed at one nominated member per state regardless of how large or small the local Anglo-Indian population was. Where a nomination was made, that member sat and functioned in the Assembly like other members, even though the seat itself was filled by nomination rather than by direct election.

Relationship with Article 170

Article 170 lays down the ordinary composition of a State Legislative Assembly: not more than five hundred and not less than sixty members, chosen by direct election from territorial constituencies drawn up so that the ratio of population to seats stays broadly uniform across the state. Article 333 opens with the words "Notwithstanding anything in article 170," which marked out the Anglo-Indian nomination as an exception standing outside this scheme of direct election and outside the population-to-seat arithmetic that governs ordinary constituencies.

Related Special Provisions for the Anglo-Indian Community

Article 333 was one of a cluster of linked provisions in Part XVI of the Constitution ("Special Provisions Relating to Certain Classes") concerning Anglo-Indian representation and welfare.

Article Subject
331 Nomination of Anglo-Indian members to the House of the People (Lok Sabha)
332 Reservation of seats for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in State Legislative Assemblies
333 Nomination of one Anglo-Indian member to a State Legislative Assembly
334 Period after which reservation of seats and special representation cease
336 Special provision for the Anglo-Indian community in certain services
337 Special provision for educational grants benefiting the Anglo-Indian community

Article 331 was the Lok Sabha counterpart of Article 333: both relied on nomination by an executive functionary — the President for the Lok Sabha, the Governor for a State Assembly — rather than election, and both applied only where the community was found not to be adequately represented already. Articles 336 and 337 extended comparable special treatment to the same community in public services and education, so Article 333 sat within a wider, linked package of provisions rather than as an isolated electoral rule.

Discontinuation by the 104th Amendment Act, 2019

The Constitution (One Hundred and Fourth Amendment) Act, 2019 did not extend the nomination of Anglo-Indian members to the Lok Sabha or to State Legislative Assemblies any further. The amendment discontinued this special representation, and the provision ceased to have effect from 25 January 2020. From that date, a Governor no longer has the power to nominate an Anglo-Indian member to a State Legislative Assembly, even though the text of Article 333 continues to remain in the Constitution.

UPSC Relevance

Prelims

  • Article 333 falls under Part XVI, alongside Articles 330–338, dealing with special provisions for certain classes.
  • The nomination under Article 333 operates "Notwithstanding anything in article 170" — an exception to the rule of direct election.
  • The Constitution (104th Amendment) Act, 2019 discontinued Anglo-Indian nomination to the Lok Sabha and State Assemblies, with effect from 25 January 2020.
  • Article 331 (Lok Sabha, President nominates) is the parallel provision to Article 333 (State Assembly, Governor nominates).

Mains

  • Discuss the rationale behind special legislative representation for a small community such as the Anglo-Indians, and evaluate the reasoning behind its eventual discontinuation.
  • Examine how Articles 330–342 together illustrate the Constitution's approach to protective and special representation for specific communities.

FAQ

Q1. What did Article 333 of the Constitution provide? It empowered a state Governor to nominate one member of the Anglo-Indian community to that state's Legislative Assembly, if the Governor was of the opinion that the community needed representation and was not adequately represented.

Q2. Is the Anglo-Indian nomination under Article 333 still in effect? No. The Constitution (104th Amendment) Act, 2019 discontinued this nomination, and the provision ceased to have effect from 25 January 2020.

Q3. How is Article 333 different from Article 170? Article 170 governs the ordinary composition of a State Legislative Assembly through direct election from territorial constituencies. Article 333 operated "notwithstanding" Article 170, allowing one seat to be filled by the Governor's nomination instead of by election.

Q4. Which article provided the equivalent nomination for the Lok Sabha? Article 331 allowed nomination of Anglo-Indian members to the House of the People; it was discontinued by the same Constitution (104th Amendment) Act, 2019.

Q5. Did Article 333 guarantee a seat for the Anglo-Indian community in every state? No. The nomination was discretionary, resting on the Governor's opinion that the community was not adequately represented; it was not an automatic reservation in every state.

Quick Revision

  • Article 333: Governor's discretionary power to nominate one Anglo-Indian member to a State Legislative Assembly.
  • Operated "Notwithstanding anything in article 170" — an exception to direct election.
  • Lok Sabha counterpart: Article 331 (President nominates Anglo-Indian members).
  • Linked Anglo-Indian provisions: Article 336 (services) and Article 337 (educational grants).
  • Discontinued by the Constitution (104th Amendment) Act, 2019; ceased to have effect from 25 January 2020.

Sources

Further Reference

For deeper reading on this topic and the wider polity syllabus, these standard works are recommended:

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, UPSC.wiki earns from qualifying purchases — at no extra cost to you.

Constitutional provisions

Article 170

Ordinary composition of State Legislative Assemblies through direct election from territorial constituencies

Article 331

Nomination of Anglo-Indian members to the House of the People (Lok Sabha)

Article 333

Nomination of one Anglo-Indian member to a State Legislative Assembly by the Governor

Article 336

Special provision for the Anglo-Indian community in certain services

Article 337

Special provision for educational grants benefiting the Anglo-Indian community

Relevant Acts & Judgments

Acts
Constitution (One Hundred and Fourth Amendment) Act, 2019
Discontinued nomination of Anglo-Indian members to the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies, effective 25 January 2020
Key distinction: Article 333 provided nomination (Governor's discretion, one member), not election or automatic reservation — and it stopped applying after the 104th Amendment Act, 2019, unlike SC/ST reservation under Article 332, which continues.
article-333anglo-indian-representationstate-legislative-assembly104th-amendment-actreservation-of-seatspart-xvi-constitution
Rate this article
No ratings yetSign in to rate

0 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.

Anglo-Indian State Assembly Nomination — Article 333 | UPSC.wiki