Article 271 lets Parliament add a surcharge on taxes under Articles 269 and 270, but keeps the entire proceeds in the Union's Consolidated Fund, unshared with states.
At a glance
Article 271 — Parliament's power to add a surcharge on taxes/duties under Articles 269 and 270, entirely for Union purposes.
The whole proceeds of any Article 271 surcharge form part of the Consolidated Fund of India — none is shared with states.
It shows how the Union can raise revenue on an otherwise shareable tax base without expanding what states receive, similar in effect to a cess.
Surcharge on Union taxes under Article 271 of the Constitution is a mechanism that lets Parliament raise additional revenue for the Union alone, by adding a surcharge on top of duties or taxes that would otherwise be shared with the states under Articles 269 and 270. It is one of the shortest provisions in the Centre-state financial relations chapter, but it has an outsized effect on how much of the Union's tax revenue actually reaches state governments.
What Article 271 Provides
Article 271 opens with a "notwithstanding" clause — "Notwithstanding anything in articles 269 and 270" — signalling that it overrides the sharing arrangements those two articles set up. It empowers Parliament to increase, at any time, any of the duties or taxes referred to in Articles 269 and 270 by way of a surcharge for the purposes of the Union. Critically, the whole proceeds of any such surcharge form part of the Consolidated Fund of India — none of it is assigned to states under Article 269, and none of it enters the divisible pool distributed under Article 270. Since the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016, this power expressly excludes the goods and services tax levied under Article 246A, meaning Parliament cannot use a Article 271 surcharge to skim additional Union-only revenue out of GST collections.
Why the "Notwithstanding" Clause Matters
Because Article 271 begins by overriding Articles 269 and 270, a surcharge imposed under it sits outside the ordinary Centre-state sharing logic that governs the base tax or duty. A tax under Article 270, for instance, is levied and collected by the Union but a prescribed percentage of its net proceeds is shared with states following Finance Commission-informed principles. If Parliament increases that same tax through an Article 271 surcharge, the base tax continues to be shared as before, but the surcharge itself is carved out entirely for Union purposes — it does not get folded into the shared pool and does not benefit from the same distribution formula.
A Neighbouring Provision That No Longer Exists
Immediately after Article 271 in the Constitution's text sat Article 272, headed "Taxes which are levied and collected by the Union and may be distributed between the Union and the States." This provision was omitted by the Constitution (Eightieth Amendment) Act, 2000, with effect from 9 June 2000 — part of the same reform that reworked Articles 269 and 270 to establish the current, broader divisible-pool arrangement. Its removal is a reminder that the current Centre-state tax-sharing architecture, including Article 271's role within it, is the product of deliberate constitutional restructuring rather than the Constitution's original 1950 design.
Comparing Surcharge, Shared Tax and Assigned Tax
| Article | Mechanism | Does it reach states? |
|---|---|---|
| 269 | Union levies and collects, assigns proceeds | Yes — entire net proceeds go to states |
| 270 | Union levies and collects, shares a prescribed percentage | Yes — a Finance Commission-informed share |
| 271 | Surcharge added on top of 269/270 taxes, for Union purposes | No — wholly retained in the Consolidated Fund of India |
This table captures why Article 271 is often discussed alongside cesses in debates on the size of the divisible pool: like a cess (which Article 270(1) also excludes from sharing), a surcharge under Article 271 increases Union revenue without correspondingly increasing what states can claim, even where it is levied on top of an otherwise shareable tax.
UPSC Relevance
Prelims
- Article 271 allows Parliament to increase duties/taxes under Articles 269 and 270 by a surcharge for Union purposes, with the entire proceeds credited to the Consolidated Fund of India.
- The 101st Amendment Act, 2016 excluded GST under Article 246A from the scope of an Article 271 surcharge.
- Article 272, which formerly dealt with a separate category of Union-collected, possibly-distributed taxes, was omitted by the 80th Amendment Act, 2000.
Mains
- Analyse how Article 271's exclusion of surcharge proceeds from the divisible pool affects vertical fiscal devolution to the states.
- Discuss the constitutional design choice of exempting GST from the Article 271 surcharge mechanism.
FAQ
Q1. What is an Article 271 surcharge? An additional levy Parliament may impose, at any time, on duties or taxes under Articles 269 and 270, for the purposes of the Union, with the whole proceeds credited to the Consolidated Fund of India.
Q2. Does the surcharge get shared with states? No. Article 271 states that the whole proceeds of any such surcharge form part of the Consolidated Fund of India, unlike the base taxes under Articles 269 and 270.
Q3. Can Parliament impose an Article 271 surcharge on GST? No — the 101st Amendment Act, 2016 amended Article 271 to exclude the goods and services tax levied under Article 246A from this power.
Q4. What was Article 272, and does it still exist? Article 272 formerly dealt with taxes levied and collected by the Union that might be distributed between Union and states; it was omitted by the Constitution (Eightieth Amendment) Act, 2000, with effect from 9 June 2000.
Q5. Why does the "notwithstanding" clause in Article 271 matter? It makes clear that Article 271 overrides the sharing arrangements of Articles 269 and 270, so a surcharge imposed under it is not subject to those articles' distribution rules.
Quick Revision
- Article 271 — Parliament may surcharge taxes/duties under Articles 269 and 270, for Union purposes only.
- Entire surcharge proceeds go to the Consolidated Fund of India — not shared with states.
- GST under Article 246A excluded from the surcharge power since the 101st Amendment, 2016.
- Article 272 (a related earlier provision) omitted by the 80th Amendment Act, 2000.
- Surcharge, like a specific-purpose cess, sits outside the Article 270 divisible pool.
Sources
- The Constitution of India, Articles 269, 270, 271 — Ministry of Law and Justice, legislative.gov.in.
Further Reference
For deeper reading on this topic and the wider polity syllabus, these standard works are recommended:
- M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (McGraw Hill) — the standard UPSC handbook.
- D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India (LexisNexis) — authoritative constitutional-law treatment.
- The Constitution of India — Bare Act — the official text.
Constitutional provisions
Surcharge on duties/taxes under Articles 269 and 270 for Union purposes; proceeds wholly to the Consolidated Fund of India.
Union-collected inter-State sale/consignment taxes, entire proceeds assigned to states.
Most Union List taxes/duties, shared with states at a Finance Commission-informed percentage.
