Suspension of Enforcement of Fundamental Rights During Emergency
Article 359 lets the President suspend court enforcement of Fundamental Rights during an emergency, but never of Articles 20 and 21.
At a glance
Presidential power under Article 359 to suspend court enforcement of specified Part III rights during a national emergency.
Articles 20 and 21 can never be suspended under Article 359, since the 44th Amendment Act, 1978.
Distinguishes suspension of a remedy from suspension of a right, and marks a major post-Emergency safeguard.
Timeline
Suspension of fundamental rights enforcement during an emergency is the power under Article 359 of the Constitution that lets the President, while a Proclamation of Emergency is in force, bar citizens from moving any court to enforce specified rights under Part III. It does not erase the rights themselves — it only shuts the door to the courts for a defined period.
What Article 359 Actually Does
Article 359(1) allows the President to issue an order declaring that the right to move any court for the enforcement of rights conferred by Part III — except Articles 20 and 21 — shall remain suspended. The suspension lasts either for the whole period the Proclamation of Emergency is in operation, or for a shorter period specified in the order itself. Any court proceedings already pending for enforcement of the mentioned rights also stand suspended for that period.
A crucial nuance is that Article 359 does not touch the rights themselves. It only removes the citizen's remedy — the ability to approach a court — for whichever rights the President's order names. Two further points follow from the text:
- The order is not automatic on the declaration of emergency; the President must separately specify which rights are covered and, optionally, a shorter duration.
- Articles 20 (protection in respect of conviction for offences) and 21 (protection of life and personal liberty) are permanently outside the reach of any Article 359 order — they can never be suspended this way.
Clause (1A): Protecting State Action Taken Under the Order
A clause (1A) was inserted into Article 359 with retrospective effect by the Constitution (Thirty-eighth Amendment) Act, 1975. It provides that while an order under clause (1) is in operation, nothing in the concerned Part III provisions restricts the State's power to make a law, or take executive action, that it would otherwise be competent to make or take. In effect, it shields legislative and executive acts taken during the suspension from being struck down as inconsistent with the suspended rights, for the period the order lasts.
The 44th Amendment Safeguard: Why Articles 20 and 21 Were Excluded
When the Constitution was originally adopted, Article 359 permitted suspension of the right to enforce any of the rights conferred by Part III — with no carve-out for Articles 20 and 21. This meant that during the 1975–77 Emergency, orders under Article 359 could, and did, block citizens from moving courts even to enforce the right to life and personal liberty. This position was tested in the habeas corpus litigation of that period, where the government's power to detain without judicial recourse was upheld on the ground that the remedy itself stood suspended.
The Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 changed the wording of Article 359(1), substituting it so that the exclusion clause — "except articles 20 and 21" — was written into the text. Since this amendment took effect (20 June 1979), no Presidential order under Article 359 can ever suspend the right to move courts for the enforcement of Articles 20 and 21, regardless of the type or scale of the emergency. This is widely regarded as one of the most significant post-Emergency correctives introduced into the Constitution.
Article 359 Alongside Article 358
Article 359 operates in the same Part XVIII framework as Article 358, but the two provisions are structurally different — Article 358 automatically suspends Article 19 itself during a war/external-aggression emergency, while Article 359 requires a specific Presidential order, can apply during any type of national emergency, and touches the remedy rather than the right. A dedicated comparison of the two is useful for exam preparation.
Key Constitutional Safeguards Around Article 359
| Safeguard | Effect |
|---|---|
| Articles 20 and 21 excluded (44th Amendment, 1978) | Right to life, personal liberty and protection against arbitrary conviction can never be suspended under Article 359 |
| Order must specify rights | President cannot issue a blanket suspension of all Part III rights without naming them |
| Duration tied to proclamation | Suspension automatically ends when the Proclamation of Emergency ceases, or earlier if the order specifies a shorter period |
| Clause (1A) (38th Amendment, 1975) | Protects only State laws/executive action taken under an active order, not the rights themselves |
UPSC Relevance
Prelims: The exact wording of Article 359(1), the rights excluded from suspension (Articles 20 and 21), and the amendment history (38th and 44th Amendments) are frequently tested factual points.
Mains: Article 359 is a recurring theme in questions on the balance between emergency powers and fundamental rights, and on how post-1977 constitutional amendments sought to prevent a repeat of the 1975–77 experience.
FAQ
Q1. Does Article 359 suspend Fundamental Rights themselves? No. It only suspends the right to move a court to enforce specified rights; the rights continue to exist in the Constitution.
Q2. Can the right to move court for Article 21 ever be suspended? No. Since the 44th Amendment Act, 1978, Articles 20 and 21 are permanently excluded from any Article 359 order.
Q3. Is a Presidential order under Article 359 automatic once an emergency is proclaimed? No. The President must separately issue an order naming the rights whose enforcement is suspended and, if intended, a shorter duration than the proclamation itself.
Q4. What does clause (1A) of Article 359 do? It protects laws made or executive action taken by the State during the period an Article 359 order is in force from being challenged as inconsistent with the rights named in that order.
Q5. How long can a suspension under Article 359 last? For as long as the Proclamation of Emergency remains in operation, or for a shorter period if the President's order specifies one.
Quick Revision
- Article 359 suspends the remedy, not the right.
- Articles 20 and 21 are permanently excluded (44th Amendment, 1978).
- Requires a specific Presidential order naming the rights.
- Duration tied to the Proclamation of Emergency or a shorter specified period.
Sources
- The Constitution of India — Ministry of Law and Justice
- Constituent Assembly Debates — Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs
Further Reference
For deeper reading on this topic and the wider polity syllabus, these standard works are recommended:
- M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (McGraw Hill) — the standard UPSC handbook.
- D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India (LexisNexis) — authoritative constitutional-law treatment.
- The Constitution of India — Bare Act — the official text.
Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, UPSC.wiki earns from qualifying purchases — at no extra cost to you.
Constitutional provisions
President may suspend the right to move courts for enforcement of specified Part III rights (except Articles 20 and 21) during an emergency.
Protects State laws/executive action taken while an Article 359 order is in force.
