PolityUPSC

44th Amendment Act, 1978: Restoring Safeguards

By Abishek A 23 September 2026 7 min read 0 views
Overview

How the 44th Amendment Act, 1978 curbed Emergency powers, restored judicial review, and ended the fundamental right to property in India post-1975.

At a glance

What it is

The Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 — introduced safeguards against misuse of Emergency powers and reversed several 42nd Amendment changes.

Key provision

Replaced 'internal disturbance' with 'armed rebellion' as the ground for a National Emergency under Article 352; required special majority approval every six months.

Key provision

Abolished the Fundamental Right to property (Article 19(1)(f), Article 31) and created Article 300-A as a legal right instead.

Landmark case

Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980) applied the amendment's restored judicial review to Emergency proclamations.

Timeline

1975
38th Amendment
Made President's satisfaction on National/Financial Emergency final and non-justiciable.
1975-77
National Emergency
Period whose circumstances the Shah Commission later found unjustified.
1976
42nd Amendment
Extended House terms, curtailed judicial review, removed legislative quorum requirement.
1978
44th Amendment Act enacted
Introduced Emergency safeguards; abolished Fundamental Right to property.
1979
Provisions take effect
Most changes came into force between 20-6-1979 and 1-8-1979.
1980
Minerva Mills case
Supreme Court confirmed Emergency proclamations are judicially reviewable.

44th amendment safeguards refer to the checks the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978 built into India's Emergency provisions and related institutions after the excesses of the 1975–77 National Emergency. Enacted by the Janata government, the amendment tightened the conditions for declaring and continuing an Emergency, subjected the President's satisfaction to judicial review, reversed several changes the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 had made, and removed the right to property from the list of Fundamental Rights.

Background: Why the Amendment Was Needed

After the Emergency was lifted in 1977, the new government appointed the Shah Commission to examine the circumstances behind its declaration. The Commission found no justification for invoking Emergency powers in 1975. This finding, combined with the widespread perception that the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 had concentrated excessive power in the executive and curbed judicial oversight, led Parliament to enact the 44th Amendment Act in 1978 specifically to guard against future misuse of Emergency provisions.

Restrictions on the National Emergency (Article 352)

The amendment altered several features of Article 352 that govern how a National Emergency is declared, approved, and continued.

Feature Position before 1978 Position after the 44th Amendment
Ground for proclamation "Internal disturbance" "Armed rebellion"
Basis for proclamation Could be issued on the Prime Minister's advice alone Requires a written recommendation of the Union Cabinet
Parliamentary approval window Two months One month
Approving majority Simple majority Special majority (majority of total membership, and not less than two-thirds of members present and voting)
Continuation Could remain in force indefinitely once approved Must be re-approved by Parliament every six months
Revocation President's discretion only President must revoke if the Lok Sabha passes a resolution disapproving continuance
Judicial review of the proclamation Made final and non-justiciable by the 38th Amendment, 1975 That immunity was deleted; the proclamation is now open to judicial review

The amendment also insulated Articles 20 (protection in respect of conviction for offences) and 21 (protection of life and personal liberty) from suspension under Article 359 during a National Emergency — these two rights can no longer be taken away even while an Emergency is in force.

On judicial review, the Supreme Court applied this changed position in Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980), holding that a proclamation of Emergency can be challenged in court on the ground that it is mala fide, or based on wholly extraneous and irrelevant facts, or is absurd or perverse.

Financial Emergency and President's Rule

The 38th Amendment Act, 1975 had also made the President's satisfaction in declaring a Financial Emergency under Article 360 final and beyond judicial scrutiny. The 44th Amendment deleted this immunity as well, so a Financial Emergency proclamation is now subject to judicial review in the same manner as a National Emergency.

For President's Rule under Article 356, the amendment introduced a specific restraint on prolonged use: once a proclamation has been in force for a year, its continuation beyond that point — in extensions of six months at a time — is permitted only if two conditions are simultaneously met: a proclamation of National Emergency is already in operation in the whole of India, or in the whole or part of the state concerned, and the Election Commission certifies that holding assembly elections in that state is not possible due to genuine difficulties.

Abolition of the Fundamental Right to Property

The 44th Amendment made one of its most far-reaching changes outside the Emergency provisions: it repealed Article 19(1)(f), which had guaranteed citizens the right to acquire, hold, and dispose of property, and omitted Article 31, which had guaranteed compensation for compulsory acquisition of property by the State.

In place of these, the amendment inserted a new Article 300-A in Part XII of the Constitution, converting the right to property from a Fundamental Right into a mere legal right. As a legal right, it can no longer be enforced directly through a writ petition to the Supreme Court under Article 32, and — unlike a Fundamental Right — it does not form part of the basic structure of the Constitution. The amendment did retain limited compensation safeguards for two categories: minority educational institutions and small landholders whose land is acquired.

Reversing the 42nd Amendment: Restoring the Pre-1976 Balance

Several other changes undid alterations the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976 had made during the Emergency itself:

  • The term of the Lok Sabha and state Legislative Assemblies, which the 42nd Amendment had extended to six years, was restored to five years.
  • The quorum requirement for a sitting of a House of Parliament or a state legislature, which the 42nd Amendment had removed, was restored.
  • The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court and High Courts over judicial review, which the 42nd Amendment had curtailed, was restored to its earlier scope.

UPSC Relevance

Prelims

  • The 44th Amendment Act, 1978 replaced "internal disturbance" with "armed rebellion" as the ground for a National Emergency under Article 352.
  • It shifted the right to property from Article 19(1)(f)/Article 31 (Fundamental Rights, Part III) to Article 300-A (Part XII) as a legal right.
  • It requires a written Cabinet recommendation, a one-month parliamentary approval window, and a special majority to approve an Emergency proclamation.
  • It protects Articles 20 and 21 from suspension even during a National Emergency.

Mains

  • Evaluate the 44th Amendment Act, 1978 as a course-correction to the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976, with reference to the balance between executive power and constitutional safeguards. (GS2)
  • Discuss how judicial review of Emergency proclamations, restored by the 44th Amendment and applied in Minerva Mills (1980), strengthens the doctrine of basic structure. (GS2)
  • Examine the constitutional and practical implications of converting the right to property from a Fundamental Right to a legal right under Article 300-A. (GS2)

FAQ

Q1. What did the 44th Amendment Act, 1978 do to the right to property? It repealed Article 19(1)(f) and omitted Article 31 from Part III, ending the Fundamental Right to property, and inserted Article 300-A in Part XII, making it an ordinary legal right instead.

Q2. Why was the 44th Amendment Act enacted? It was enacted after the Shah Commission found no justification for the 1975 Emergency, to introduce safeguards preventing misuse of Emergency provisions and to reverse several centralising changes made by the 42nd Amendment Act, 1976.

Q3. What ground for declaring a National Emergency did the 44th Amendment introduce? It replaced "internal disturbance" with "armed rebellion" as a ground under Article 352.

Q4. Can Articles 20 and 21 be suspended during a National Emergency after the 44th Amendment? No. The amendment specifically protects Articles 20 and 21 from suspension under Article 359 even while a National Emergency is in force.

Q5. How did the 44th Amendment change parliamentary approval of an Emergency proclamation? It reduced the approval window from two months to one month, required a special majority for approval, and made periodic re-approval every six months necessary for continuation.

Quick Revision

  • 44th Amendment Act, 1978 — enacted after the Shah Commission report on the 1975 Emergency.
  • Article 352: ground changed from "internal disturbance" to "armed rebellion"; written Cabinet recommendation required.
  • Emergency approval: one month window, special majority, renewed every six months.
  • Articles 20 and 21 cannot be suspended during a National Emergency.
  • 38th Amendment's bar on judicial review of Emergency/Financial Emergency proclamations was deleted.
  • Article 356 (President's Rule): extension beyond one year needs a concurrent National Emergency plus an Election Commission certificate.
  • Right to property: Article 19(1)(f) and Article 31 removed from Part III; new Article 300-A makes it a legal right.
  • Lok Sabha/Assembly term, legislative quorum, and SC/HC judicial review jurisdiction restored to pre-42nd-Amendment position.

Sources

Further Reference

For deeper reading on this topic and the wider polity syllabus, these standard works are recommended:

  • Indian Polity — M. Laxmikanth — the standard UPSC handbook covering constitutional amendments in detail.
  • Introduction to the Constitution of India — D.D. Basu — an authoritative treatment of constitutional-law developments including the 44th Amendment.
  • The Constitution of India — Bare Act — the official text of the amended provisions.

Constitutional provisions

Article 352

National Emergency — ground changed to 'armed rebellion'; Cabinet recommendation, one-month approval, special majority, six-monthly renewal.

Article 356

President's Rule — extension beyond one year needs a concurrent National Emergency plus an Election Commission certificate.

Article 359

Suspension of Part III enforcement during Emergency — Articles 20 and 21 excluded from suspension.

Article 360

Financial Emergency — President's satisfaction made subject to judicial review again.

Article 300-A

New provision in Part XII making the right to property a legal (not Fundamental) right.

Relevant Acts & Judgments

Acts
Constitution (38th Amendment) Act, 1975
Made Emergency proclamations non-justiciable; this immunity was later deleted by the 44th Amendment.
Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976
Extended House terms to six years and curtailed judicial review; several changes reversed by the 44th Amendment.
Constitution (44th Amendment) Act, 1978
Introduced Emergency safeguards and abolished the Fundamental Right to property.
Judgments
Minerva Mills Ltd. v. Union of India (1980)
Supreme Court held Emergency proclamations can be judicially challenged for mala fide or perverse exercise of power.
Key distinction: The 42nd Amendment (1976) expanded executive and Parliamentary power during the Emergency; the 44th Amendment (1978) reversed much of it and added specific safeguards against future misuse of Emergency provisions.
44th-amendmentemergency-provisionsright-to-propertyarticle-356constitutional-amendmentsbasic-structure
Rate this article
No ratings yetSign in to rate

0 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.

44th Amendment Act, 1978: Restoring Safeguards | UPSC.wiki