PolityUPSC

Early Childhood Care and Education (Article 45)

By Abishek A 26 September 2026 5 min read 0 views
Overview

Article 45, recast by the 86th Amendment (2002), directs the State to provide early childhood care and education for children below six years.

At a glance

What it is

A Directive Principle (Article 45) directing the State to provide early childhood care and education for children below six years.

Landmark case

Unni Krishnan (1993) — Supreme Court read a right to free education (up to age 14) into Article 21, ahead of the 86th Amendment.

Why it matters

Marks the constitutional dividing line between pre-school care (Article 45, Directive Principle) and elementary education (Article 21A, Fundamental Right).

Timeline

1950
Original Article 45 enacted
Covered free and compulsory education for children up to 14 years.
1993
Unni Krishnan case
Supreme Court reads right to education (up to 14) into Article 21.
2002
86th Constitutional Amendment Act
Inserted Article 21A; recast Article 45 for under-six early childhood care; added Fundamental Duty under Article 51A.

Early childhood education for children below six years is the subject of Article 45 of the Constitution, which currently reads: "The State shall endeavour to provide early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of six years." This is a Directive Principle of State Policy in Part IV, but its wording and purpose changed significantly through a constitutional amendment in 2002 that shifted the age-6-to-14 education mandate elsewhere in the Constitution.

The Original Article 45

As originally enacted in 1950, Article 45 directed the State to endeavour to provide free and compulsory education for all children until they completed the age of fourteen years. Being a Directive Principle, this goal was not enforceable by courts, and full achievement of universal elementary education remained elusive for decades even as the State made gradual progress.

The 86th Amendment: A Turning Point

The Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002 fundamentally restructured how elementary education is treated constitutionally. It did three things together:

Change Effect
Inserted Article 21A Made free and compulsory education for children aged 6–14 years a Fundamental Right, enforceable by courts.
Rewrote Article 45 Repurposed it as a Directive Principle specifically for early childhood care and education for children below six years.
Added a Fundamental Duty Article 51A now requires every citizen who is a parent or guardian to provide opportunities for education to their child or ward between six and fourteen years of age.

This reallocation meant that the enforceable right to elementary education moved from the non-justiciable Part IV into the justiciable Part III, while Article 45 was repurposed to cover the younger, pre-school age group that Article 21A does not reach.

Judicial Background: The Unni Krishnan Case

Even before the 86th Amendment, the Supreme Court in the Unni Krishnan case (1993) had recognised a right to primary education as part of the right to life under Article 21. The Court held that every child has a right to free education until the age of fourteen, after which the right becomes subject to the limits of the state's economic capacity and development. This judicial recognition anticipated, and arguably paved the way for, the later constitutional entrenchment of the right to elementary education through the 86th Amendment.

Why Early Childhood Care Matters

By focusing Article 45 specifically on children below six, the Constitution recognises early childhood as a distinct developmental stage requiring dedicated care and education — a foundation stage that precedes and supports formal elementary schooling. Since Article 45 remains a Directive Principle rather than a Fundamental Right, the State's obligation to provide this early care remains a matter of policy commitment (through programmes for early childhood development) rather than a right individuals can enforce in court.

UPSC Relevance

Prelims

  • Article 45's original text (1950) covered free education for children up to age 14; the 86th Amendment (2002) recast it for children below six.
  • Article 21A (Fundamental Right to elementary education, ages 6–14) was inserted by the same 86th Amendment.
  • A corresponding Fundamental Duty was added to Article 51A for parents/guardians.

Mains

  • Trace how the 86th Constitutional Amendment Act, 2002 redistributed the constitutional treatment of education across Articles 21A, 45, and 51A.
  • Discuss the significance of the Unni Krishnan judgment for the constitutional recognition of the right to education.

FAQ

Q1. What does Article 45 currently provide? It directs the State to endeavour to provide early childhood care and education for all children until they complete the age of six years.

Q2. What did Article 45 originally say? Before 2002, it directed the State to endeavour to provide free and compulsory education for all children until age fourteen.

Q3. Which amendment changed Article 45? The Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002, which also inserted Article 21A and a related Fundamental Duty under Article 51A.

Q4. Is early childhood education under Article 45 a Fundamental Right? No. It remains a Directive Principle of State Policy under Part IV and is not directly enforceable by courts, unlike Article 21A which is a Fundamental Right.

Q5. What is the link to the Unni Krishnan case? In 1993, the Supreme Court held that the right to free education for children up to fourteen years flows from the right to life under Article 21, a judicial recognition that preceded the 86th Amendment's formal constitutional changes.

Quick Revision

  • Article 45 (current): early childhood care and education for children below six.
  • Article 45 (original, pre-2002): free and compulsory education up to age 14.
  • 86th Amendment Act, 2002: inserted Article 21A, recast Article 45, added duty under Article 51A.
  • Article 21A: Fundamental Right to education, ages 6–14, justiciable.
  • Unni Krishnan case (1993): linked education to Article 21 (right to life) before the amendment.

Sources

Further Reference

For deeper reading on this topic and the wider polity syllabus, these standard works are recommended:

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, UPSC.wiki earns from qualifying purchases — at no extra cost to you.

Constitutional provisions

Article 21A

Fundamental Right to free and compulsory education for children aged 6–14.

Article 45

Directive Principle: State to provide early childhood care and education for children below six.

Article 51A

Fundamental Duty of parents/guardians to provide education opportunities to children aged 6–14.

Relevant Acts & Judgments

Acts
Constitution (Eighty-sixth Amendment) Act, 2002
Inserted Article 21A, recast Article 45, and added a Fundamental Duty under Article 51A.
Judgments
Unni Krishnan v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1993)
Recognised a right to free education up to age 14 as part of the right to life under Article 21.
Key distinction: Article 45 (early childhood care, below age 6, Directive Principle, non-justiciable) is distinct from Article 21A (elementary education, ages 6-14, Fundamental Right, justiciable).
article-45early-childhood-educationdirective-principles86th-amendmentright-to-education
Rate this article
No ratings yetSign in to rate

0 Comments

Sign in to join the discussion.

Article 45: Early Childhood Care and Education | UPSC.wiki