Election Process: Nomination, Campaign and Model Code of Conduct

Election process nomination in India begins once the Election Commission announces the schedule and continues through filing of nominations, scrutiny, withdrawal, campaigning and polling, all conducted under the constitutional authority of Article 324 and guided by the Model Code of Conduct. Together these stages and rules are designed to keep the exercise of adult franchise free, fair and transparent.

Constitutional Basis: Article 324

Article 324 of the Constitution vests the superintendence, direction and control of the preparation of electoral rolls and the conduct of elections to Parliament, the State legislatures, and the offices of President and Vice-President in the Election Commission. This makes the Commission an independent constitutional authority standing outside the ordinary administrative hierarchy of the Union and State governments, so that no single government controls the machinery that decides its own re-election.

The Commission is composed of a Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners. The Chief Election Commissioner enjoys security of tenure comparable to a Supreme Court judge: removal is possible only if both Houses of Parliament recommend it to the President by special majority, a safeguard meant to prevent the party in power from removing a Commissioner unwilling to act in its favour. Other Election Commissioners can be removed by the President.

Stages of the Election Process

Once an election is due, the Commission notifies the schedule, which sets out the date of notification, the last date for filing nominations, the date of scrutiny of nominations, the last date for withdrawal of candidature, the date(s) of polling, and the date of counting and declaration of results.

Throughout this period, the Election Commission controls the administrative machinery deployed for election-related duty, even though it has very limited permanent staff of its own. It can transfer officials or halt transfers, act against officials who behave in a partisan manner, order a repoll in a constituency where the process was vitiated, order a recount where counting is disputed, and even postpone or cancel an election in a constituency, a State, or the entire country if it concludes that a free and fair poll is not possible.

Nomination and the 61st Amendment

Eligibility to vote flows from adult suffrage. The 61st Constitutional Amendment Act, 1988, reduced the voting age from 21 to 18 years for elections to the Lok Sabha and State assemblies, widening the electorate and giving younger citizens an avenue to participate in the political process.

Campaign Rules and Expenditure Ceilings

Once nominations are finalised, candidates and parties campaign for votes, but the process is bound by rules meant to prevent unfair advantage. Parties and candidates may not bribe or threaten voters, may not appeal to voters on grounds of caste or religion, and may not use government resources or official vehicles for campaigning. Candidates are also subject to ceilings on election expenditure.

A candidate found guilty of such corrupt practices can have the election set aside and face removal from office, since these restrictions draw on the Representation of the People Act's provisions on corrupt practices, not merely on convention.

The Model Code of Conduct

The Model Code of Conduct (MCC) is a set of norms and guidelines that political parties and candidates voluntarily agree to observe once an election is announced. It was first agreed to by all political parties in 1968, but the Election Commission put it to effective use for the first time only in 1991, as a tool to secure a level playing field between contesting parties and candidates and to protect the purity of the election process.

The Code covers general conduct as well as the special obligations of the party in power. Under general conduct, no party or candidate may indulge in activity that aggravates existing differences or creates hatred or tension between castes, communities, or religious and linguistic groups, and criticism of rival parties must stay confined to their policies, programmes and record rather than the private lives of their leaders and workers. For the party in power, whether at the Centre or in a State, the Code requires that no cause be given for complaints that it is misusing its official position for electioneering — ministers, for instance, are not to combine official visits with campaign work or use official machinery and personnel for electioneering. Parties and candidates who notice a violation may bring it to the notice of the Commission's Observers.

Election Manifestos and the Model Code

Because manifestos are usually released before the formal announcement of an election, the Commission does not automatically have authority to regulate their content. Following directions from the Supreme Court, however, and after consulting recognised national and State political parties, the Commission issued guidelines requiring that election manifestos not contain anything repugnant to the ideals and principles of the Constitution and remain consistent with the Model Code. While the Directive Principles of State Policy support the framing of welfare measures, parties are expected to avoid promises likely to vitiate the purity of elections or unduly influence voters, and manifestos should indicate the rationale for promises along with the means of financing them, so that voters' trust is sought only on commitments that are realistically achievable.

Proposed Electoral Reforms

Several reform ideas relating to the election process and the Model Code have been discussed. These include giving the Code of Conduct the sanctity of law so that its violation attracts penal action, rather than it remaining a voluntary agreement; barring a candidate from contesting for the same office from more than one constituency simultaneously; examining a run-off system requiring a winning candidate to secure 50 per cent plus one of the votes polled, instead of the current first-past-the-post method; and permanently debarring an independent candidate who loses three consecutive elections from contesting again. These remain proposals rather than enacted law.

UPSC Relevance

Prelims

• Article 324 and the composition and functions of the Election Commission are frequently tested.
• The 61st Amendment Act, 1988 (voting age 21 to 18) is a recurring factual question.
• Distinguish the legally backed expenditure/corrupt-practice provisions from the voluntary Model Code of Conduct.

Mains

• Discuss the constitutional safeguards that make the Election Commission an independent authority (GS2).
• Evaluate the effectiveness of the Model Code of Conduct in ensuring free and fair elections and the case for giving it statutory backing (GS2).
• Examine reforms proposed to strengthen the election process, including expenditure regulation and candidacy restrictions (GS2).

FAQ

What is the constitutional basis of the Election Commission's authority over elections? Article 324 vests the superintendence, direction and control of electoral rolls and the conduct of elections to Parliament, State legislatures, and the offices of President and Vice-President in the Election Commission.

What is the Model Code of Conduct? It is a voluntary set of norms agreed to by political parties, first accepted in 1968 and effectively enforced by the Election Commission from 1991, intended to ensure a level playing field and protect the purity of the election process.

Is the Model Code of Conduct legally enforceable? Not by itself — it operates as a voluntary agreement among parties. Some campaign restrictions, such as spending limits and the prohibition on corrupt practices, are backed by the Representation of the People Act, and their violation can lead to an election being set aside.

How did the 61st Amendment Act change the electorate? It reduced the voting age from 21 to 18 years for Lok Sabha and State assembly elections, expanding participation to younger citizens.

Can the Election Commission cancel or postpone an election? Yes. If it concludes that the atmosphere is vitiated and a free and fair poll is not possible, it can postpone or cancel an election in a constituency, a State, or the entire country.

Quick Revision

• Article 324 — ECI's constitutional mandate over elections.
• 61st Amendment Act, 1988 — voting age reduced from 21 to 18.
• MCC agreed to in 1968; first effectively enforced in 1991.
• Expenditure ceilings: indicatively Rs 25 lakh (Lok Sabha), Rs 10 lakh (Assembly).
• MCC is voluntary; corrupt-practice and expenditure provisions are backed by law.
• CEC removable only via special-majority recommendation of both Houses to the President.

Sources

• Constitution of India, Article 324 — legislative.gov.in
• Election Commission of India — official website

Further Reference

For deeper reading on this topic and the wider polity syllabus, these standard works are recommended:

• M. Laxmikanth, Indian Polity (McGraw Hill) — the standard UPSC handbook.
• D.D. Basu, Introduction to the Constitution of India (LexisNexis) — authoritative constitutional-law treatment.
• The Constitution of India — Bare Act — the official text.

Disclosure: As an Amazon Associate, UPSC.wiki earns from qualifying purchases — at no extra cost to you.